Corruption Watch has received no response to its urgent letter sent to the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development last week, in connection with applications for a vacancy at the South African Human Rights Commission. The organisation cited concerns regarding meaningful public participation in the appointment process, and asked for clarity on other concerns.

Corruption Watch has received no response to its urgent letter sent to the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development last week, in connection with applications for a vacancy at the South African Human Rights Commission. The organisation cited concerns regarding meaningful public participation in the appointment process, and asked for clarity on other concerns.

Parliament is repeating its mistakes on Chapter 9 appointments

Public participation

Corruption Watch has written to the parliamentary portfolio committee on Justice and Constitutional Development urging it to extend the window for public commentary on the currently advertised vacancy at the South African Human Rights Commission. The organisation has reminded Parliament that in August 2025 the Constitutional Court held that it must satisfactorily meet its obligations imposed in terms of section 59(1)(a) of the Constitution and says that 14 days to scrutinise 95 CVs is "manifestly unreasonable".

Corruption Watch has written to the parliamentary portfolio committee on Justice and Constitutional Development urging it to extend the window for public commentary on the currently advertised vacancy at the South African Human Rights Commission. The organisation has reminded Parliament that in August 2025 the Constitutional Court held that it must satisfactorily meet its obligations imposed in terms of section 59(1)(a) of the Constitution and says that 14 days to scrutinise 95 CVs is "manifestly unreasonable".

CW asks parly committee to abide by ConCourt ruling on public participation

Our work

The Phala Phala test — is SA ready to end selective outrage against corruption?

South Africa does not have a corruption problem alone, writes Corruption Watch's Melusi Ncala - it also has a selective outrage problem. The Constitutional Court’s Phala Phala ruling of 11 May may be the moment South Africa discovers whether our society is capable, finally, of applying the same standard to those it admires as to those it despises.

South Africa does not have a corruption problem alone, writes Corruption Watch's Melusi Ncala - it also has a selective outrage problem. The Constitutional Court’s Phala Phala ruling of 11 May may be the moment South Africa discovers whether our society is capable, finally, of applying the same standard to those it admires as to those it despises.

Corruption Watch today releases its 14th annual corruption report, titled Ke Nako: Mobilising for justice, with the aim of gathering all sectors into the fight against corruption, as this is not a goal that can be achieved by only one or two participants. The time has come for all of society to demand justice and accountability from those in power, says board chairperson Themba Maseko.

Corruption Watch today releases its 14th annual corruption report, titled Ke Nako: Mobilising for justice, with the aim of gathering all sectors into the fight against corruption, as this is not a goal that can be achieved by only one or two participants. The time has come for all of society to demand justice and accountability from those in power, says board chairperson Themba Maseko.

CW releases its 2025 annual corruption report

Corruption Watch, in collaboration with Social Change Assistance Trust or SCAT, and Transparency International, and co-funded by the European Union, has embarked on the Strengthening Action Against Corruption (SAAC) project which focuses specifically on empowering and educating community advice offices/civil society organisations in the Eastern Cape province. Follow our activities here.

Strengthening Action Against Corruption